Policy dismantling at EU level: Reaching the limits of ‘an ever‐closer ecological union’?
Policy dismantling at EU level: Reaching the limits of ‘an ever‐closer ecological union’?
复制标题
欧盟层面的政策解体：达到“日益紧密的生态联盟”的极限？
DOI：
10.1111/padm.12605
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
A. Jordan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Viviane Gravey;A. Jordan
在解释了它们的采用之后，分析人士现在正试图理解欧盟环境政策随后是如何随着时间的推移而演变的。2003年，戴维·沃格尔(David Vogel)做出了一个著名的推测，即在环境竞赛中超越美国登上榜首之后，欧盟的政策最终也将屈服于政策僵局，即既不扩张，也不解体。自那以后，经验研究证实，欧盟的政策扩张正在下降，但人们对为什么拆解也非常有限知之甚少。这篇文章通过重新配置拆除--一个为国家政策系统制定的概念--开辟了新的天地，解释了欧盟层面(1992年至2016年)部署的各种拆除战略。它发现，没有进行重大解散，既是因为早期解散尝试具有象征性，也是因为最近试图建立联盟以克服欧盟政策变化的体制障碍的努力失败了。
Having explained their adoption, analysts are now trying to understand how EU environmental policies have subsequently evolved over time. In 2003, David Vogel famously speculated that having overtaken the US in the environmental race to the top, EU policies would also eventually succumb to policy gridlock, i.e. neither expanding nor dismantling. Empirical research has since confirmed that EU policy expansion is in decline, but less is known about why dismantling has also been very limited. This article breaks new ground by reconfiguring dismantling – a concept developed for national policy systems – to explain the various dismantling strategies deployed at EU level (1992 to 2016). It finds that the absence of significant dismantling is due both to the symbolic nature of early dismantling attempts and the failure of more recent attempts to build coalitions that overcome institutional obstacles to policy change in the EU.
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
A. Schaffrin;Sebastian Sewerin;Sibylle Seubert
通讯作者：
A. Schaffrin;Sebastian Sewerin;Sibylle Seubert