Migration Normalcy: Havana’s Dialogue with Washington before the Balsero Crisis
Migration Normalcy: Havana’s Dialogue with Washington before the Balsero Crisis
复制标题
移民常态:巴尔塞罗危机前哈瓦那与华盛顿的对话
DOI:
10.1093/dh/dhac064
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
0.4
通讯作者:
Hideaki Kami
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
上田悠久 ; 梅田百合香 ; 岡田拓也 ; 犬塚元 ; 稲村一隆;Takuya Okada;Takuya Okada;岡田拓也;岡田拓也;Takuya Okada;林孝宗;Hideaki Kami
In April 1993, just days after Roberto Robaina became Cuba’s foreign minister, he received a proposal for migration talks from the United States, the world’s only superpower and the greatest threat to his government. He had to recommend to Cuban President Fidel Castro what to do with it. The intelligent but inexperienced foreign minister could not help but turn to his senior colleagues for counsel. He wrote to Ricardo Alarcón, the former foreign minister and president of the National Assembly of People’s Power; Abelardo Colomé, minister of the Ministry of the Interior; and José Ramón Balaguer, head of the Cuban Communist Party’s departments of ideology and international relations. 1 As it turned out, the decision was not controversial. Regardless of the popular image of Cuba as the ideological antithesis to the United States, no one in the top echelon of Cuban leadership opposed migration talks with their northern neighbor. 2For both Washington and Havana, an orderly flow of people was desirable, if only attainable through effective diplomacy. The Mariel boatlift, the most extraordinary migration disorder in the history of Cuban-US relations, had an enormous impact on both countries’ foreign policy priorities. Between April and October 1980, around 125,000 Cubans flooded the United States, caused bureaucratic chaos across US cities, and revamped Washington’s core interest in Cuba. So traumatized by the experience, even the most anti-communist US president, Ronald Reagan, approached his nemesis, Fidel Castro, for talks. In 1984, the two Cold War rivals, while confronting each other in Africa and Latin America, announced the first migration accord, in which both parties pledged to