Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors
Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008
复制
发表时间：
2008-01-01
影响因子：
16.8
通讯作者：
Lortie, Christopher J.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Budden, Amber E.;Tregenza, Tom;Lortie, Christopher J.
双盲同行评议，即既不透露作者身份，也不透露审稿人身份，很少在生态学或进化论期刊中实行。2001年，《行为生态学》杂志引入了双盲审查。在这一政策变化之后，女性第一作者的论文显著增加，这种模式在为审稿人提供作者信息的非常类似的期刊中没有观察到。未发现任何负面影响，表明其他期刊应考虑进行双盲审查。
Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer identity are revealed, is rarely practised in ecology or evolution journals. However, in 2001, double-blind review was introduced by the journal Behavioral Ecology. Following this policy change, there was a significant increase in female first-authored papers, a pattern not observed in a very similar journal that provides reviewers with author information. No negative effects could be identified, suggesting that double-blind review should be considered by other journals.