Assessment and treatment of suicidal clients in a university counseling center

Assessment and treatment of suicidal clients in a university counseling center
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0022-0167.44.4.368
复制
发表时间:
1997-10-01
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Hustead, LAT
Hustead, LAT
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jobes, DA;Jacoby, AM;Hustead, LAT

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

两项研究探讨了与自杀学生客户有关的评估和治疗问题。在研究1中,描述了自杀状态表(SSF)的理论构建和心理测量特性。结果表明,SSF项目具有较好的聚合效度、较强的效标预测效度和中等的重测信度。在研究2中,SSF被应用于自杀的学生客户的样本。结果表明客户和临床医生治疗前SSF评级之间存在差异。客户(而不是临床医生)治疗前SSF评级可用于正确分类客户急性解决和慢性非解决治疗结果组。虽然所有自杀的学生客户在全球范围内改善了治疗,但慢性非解决者在整个学年中仍然专注于自杀。这些研究结果进行了讨论方面的培训,临床实践和未来的研究。
Two studies addressed assessment and treatment issues pertaining to suicidal student-clients, In Study 1, the theoretical construction and psychometric properties of the Suicide Status Form (SSF) were described. Results suggest that SSF items have good convergent validity, strong criterion-prediction validity, and moderate test-retest reliability. In Study 2, the SSF was applied to a sample of suicidal student-clients. Results suggest differences between client and clinician pretreatment SSF ratings. Client (not clinician) pretreatment SSF ratings could be used to correctly classify clients into acute resolver and chronic nonresolver treatment-outcome groups. Whereas all suicidal student-clients globally improved with treatment, chronic nonresolvers remained suicidally preoccupied throughout the academic year. These findings are discussed with regard to training, clinical practice, and future research.