Interactive modulations between congruency sequence effects and validity sequence effects

Interactive modulations between congruency sequence effects and validity sequence effects
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s00426-021-01612-4
复制
发表时间:
2021-10-28
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Shinomori,Keizo
Shinomori,Keizo
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Qian,Qian;Li,Yingna;Shinomori,Keizo

文献摘要

相似文献

在冲突和空间定向任务中都发现了顺序调制。前者被称为一致性序列效应(CSE),后者被称为有效性序列效应(VSE)。虽然这两种效应有相似的现象描述,但两种效应下认知控制机制的关系尚不清楚。采用改进的注意网络测试(ANT),将侧翼任务和箭头提示任务整合为一个任务,从而能够测试CSE和VSE之间可能的相互作用。由于使用了最小混淆设计,观察到的序列效应不能归因于低水平刺激特征的特征整合或权变学习。结果发现,只有当前试的箭头提示无效时,CSE才显著;只有当前试的目标字母与干扰字母一致时,VSE才显著。研究结果表明,注意网络的定向和执行控制过程中的顺序调节是高度相互作用的,这些网络中的顺序效应可能受到复杂的、多方面的自适应控制机制的控制。
Sequential modulations have been found in both conflict and spatial orienting tasks. The former is called congruency sequence effects (CSE) and the latter is called validity sequence effects (VSE). Although the two effects have similar phenomenon descriptions, the relationship of the cognitive control mechanisms under the two effects is still unclear. Using a modified attentional network test (ANT), a flanker task and an arrow cueing task are integrated into a single task, which enables the test of the possible interactions between CSE and VSE. Since a confound-minimized design is used, the observed sequence effects cannot be attributed to the feature integration of low-level stimulus features or the contingency learning. It was found that the CSE are only significant when the arrow cue in preceding trial is invalid, and the VSE are only significant when the target letter in preceding trial is congruent with the distractor letters. The findings suggest that the sequential modulations during orienting and executive control of attention networks are highly interacted with each other, and the sequence effects in these networks are possibly controlled by a complex and multifaceted adaptive control mechanism.