The Simple View of Reading: Three Assessments of Its Adequacy
The Simple View of Reading: Three Assessments of Its Adequacy
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0741932518773154
复制
发表时间：
2018-09-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Tunmer, William E.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hoover, Wesley A.;Tunmer, William E.
在这篇文章中，我们提供了一些评论的简单的看法阅读（SVR），现在约30年后，其最初的建议和实证工作（高夫和Tunmer，1986年;胡佛和高夫，1990年）。我们开始概述什么是SVR作为一个概念模型，以及它不是什么。接下来，我们对本期特刊中提出的三篇评估SVR是否充分的论文进行评论。最后，我们对所审查的三篇论文的主要观点进行了思考。在整个研究过程中，我们不仅对简单观的研究进行了评论，而且还对其教育意义进行了评论。
In this article, we provide some comments on the simple view of reading (SVR), now some 30 years after its initial proposal and empirical work (Gough & Tunmer, 1986; Hoover & Gough, 1990). We begin with an overview of what the SVR is as a conceptual model, as well as what it is not. We follow this with comments, in turn, on three papers presented in this special issue that assessed the adequacy of the SVR. We close with thoughts on the main points across the three papers reviewed. Throughout, we not only comment on the research about the simple view but also on its educational implications.