Are Restorative Justice Conferences More Fair Than Criminal Courts? Comparing Levels of Observed Procedural Justice in the Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE)
Are Restorative Justice Conferences More Fair Than Criminal Courts? Comparing Levels of Observed Procedural Justice in the Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE)
复制标题
恢复性司法会议比刑事法庭更公平吗？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Sherman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Barnes;Jordan M. Hyatt;C. Angel;H. Strang;L. Sherman
重新整合羞辱实验（RISE）于1995年至2000年间在澳大利亚堪培拉进行。RISE比较了标准法庭程序对恢复性司法（RJ）重点转移注意力会议（dc）的影响，这些会议涉及因个人财产、入店行窃、暴力或酒驾犯罪而被捕的青少年、青少年和成年罪犯。我们使用观察数据评估了RJ会议对客观程序公正的影响。我们发现，在审判过程中，dc产生了明显更高水平的罪犯参与和更高水平的道德待遇，并且，与标准审判相比，会议中的行为与重新整合羞辱（RIS）过程相一致。这些结果通过提供证据来证明会议过程与RJ的总体目标保持一致，并支持将RISE的有效性归因于RJ过程，从而加强了之前RISE的发现。
The reintegrative shaming experiments (RISE) were conducted in Canberra, Australia, between 1995 and 2000. RISE compared the effects of standard court proceedings to restorative justice (RJ)–focused diversionary conferences (DCs) with juvenile, young adult, and adult offenders who had been arrested for personal property, shoplifting, violent, or drunk driving offenses. We evaluated, using observational data, the effect of RJ conferences on objective procedural justice. We find that the DCs produced significantly higher levels of offender engagement within the adjudicative process and higher levels of ethical treatment, and that, when compared with standard trials, conduct within the conferences was attuned to the reintegrative shaming (RIS) process. These results reinforce the previous RISE findings by providing evidence that the conferencing process, as delivered, was in keeping with the overall goals of RJ and supports the prior attribution of RISE’s effectiveness to the RJ process.