Sound of silent synapses from the addicted hippocampus.
Sound of silent synapses from the addicted hippocampus.
复制标题
沉迷的海马体发出无声的突触声。
DOI:
10.1038/s41386-018-0142-5
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Dong,Yan
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Koya,Eisuke;Dong,Yan
Enriched in the developing brain, most silent synapses are immature glutamatergic synapses that contain stable NMDA receptors (NMDARs) with AMPA receptors (AMPARs) that are either absent or highly labile, and thus are AMPAR-silent [1]. They serve as initial connections between neurons to form new neural circuits. During development, some silent synapses undergo experience-dependent maturation by recruiting or stabilizing AMPARs to consolidate synaptic connections. Prior studies have revealed in adult rodents that non-contingent cocaine injections generate silent synapses in the nucleus accumbens (NAc)[2, 3], a brain region implicated in motivational learning and memory relevant to addiction [4]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that cocaine self-administration generates silent synapses in the amygdalar and prefrontal cortical projections to the NAc, followed by AMPAR insertion-mediated maturation after cocaine withdrawal. This silent synapse-mediated circuit remodeling contributes to incubation of cue-induced cocaine craving [5, 6], a time-dependent enhancement of cue-induced cocaine seeking after withdrawal [7]. These results suggest that cocaine re-activates silent synapse-mediated developmental mechanisms in the adult brain to remodel critical brain circuits and promote addictionrelated behaviors [4]. As such, several questions arise:(1) Is silent synapse-based circuit remodeling a mechanism only employed by cocaine or also by other abused drugs to redefine circuit properties?;(2) Does drug experience induce silent synapsemediated circuit remodeling in other brain regions apart from the NAc?; and (3) in addition to behaviors controlled by cue-drug associations, is silent synapse-mediated circuit remodeling involved in other hallmark features of addiction? In this issue of Neuropsychopharmacology, Beroun et al.[8] heroically addressed these questions. They employed an extended alcohol intake procedure involving training mice for alcohol selfadministration over 90 days. They then categorized the alcoholexposed mice into “addicted” vs.“non-addicted” using five DSM-IV criteria for alcohol dependence (American Psychiatric Association 2000):(1) high drinking levels during free access;(2) high motivation to drink;(3) persistent alcohol seeking despite alcohol unavailability;(4) alcohol cue exposure induced alcohol seeking;(5) excessive alcohol consumption during relapse after withdrawal. Mice that scored in the upper 35% were defined to be ‘positive’for a criterion, and mice that exhibited two or more positive criteria were considered ‘addicted’. Using this clinically relevant animal model, they performed electrophysiological and morphological investigations on granule cells in the dentate gyrus (DG), a reward-relevant region whose role in addiction remains underexplored. By chemogenetic manipulations via inhibitory (hM4Di) DREADDs, they demonstrated that after extended access to alcohol, inhibition of DG granule neurons increased both alcohol drinking and seeking in an enduring (7 days) manner, indicating that a decreased excitation of DG granule neurons promotes alcohol abuse. The authors then examined the dynamic changes of silent synapses within the perforant path to DG granule cells. Silent synapse levels increased in both addicted and non-addicted mice during alcohol self-administration, but declined to basal levels after alcohol withdrawal. Strikingly, 90 min following cue-induced alcohol seeking after withdrawal, addicted mice exhibited higher levels of silent synapses compared to non-addicted mice, suggesting an enhanced capability of excitatory synapses at DG granule cells in addicted mice to rapidly …