In Response to Lemke: Where You See a Forest, I Just See Detritus.
In Response to Lemke: Where You See a Forest, I Just See Detritus.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/jom.0000000000002342
复制
发表时间：
2021-11-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Kelly KM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kelly KM
致编辑：我和我的合著者 1 共同决定不再花额外的时间来处理 Kenneth Lemke 对我们反驳他的 TWH 社论的回应 2。 3 然而，在我最近计划退休后不久的一次意外住院期间，我开始全神贯注于他的评论。那段时间沉思的结果就是我需要做出回应的决定。我的观点很简单。我不希望研究生、年轻学者或任何其他人将 Lemke 的 JOEM 著作视为如何进行学术讨论的典范。虽然我仍然对 JOEM 发表 Lemke 有问题的社论感到困惑，3 但《华尔街日报》愿意发表他的回应，这让我感到鼓舞。 2 在回应我们的评论时，莱姆克承认他的社论学术水平较差，并在此过程中继续表现出他的学术缺陷。作为一名自 20 世纪 70 年代以来就沉浸在系统理论中的人类学家，我惊讶地读到社会科学系助理教授的一篇社论 4 宣称社会科学建立在“牛顿范式”3 的基础上。此外，作为研究科学家，他一直致力于完善系统论。
To the Editor: M y co-authors and I 1 had collectively decided not to spend additional time addressing Kenneth Lemke’s response 2 to our rebuttal of his TWH editorial. 3 However, I later became preoccupied with his comments during an unexpected hospitalization that followed soon after my recent planned retirement. The outcome of that time of contemplation was the decision that I need to respond. My point is simple. I do not want graduate students, young scholars, or any others to think of Lemke’s JOEM writings as exemplars of how to conduct scholarly discourse.Although I continue to be baffled by JOEM’s publication of Lemke’s problematic editorial, 3 I am encouraged by the Journal’s willingness to publish his response. 2 In his response to our comments, Lemke acknowledges the poor scholarship in his editorial and, in the process of doing so, continues to demonstrate his academic deficiencies. As an anthropologist immersed in systems theory since the 1970s, I was astonished to read an editorial by an assistant professor in a departmentofsocialsciences 4 proclaiming that the social sciences are grounded in a ‘‘Newtonian Paradigm.’’3 Moreover, as research scientist, who has been involved in efforts to refine