The Social Terrain of Rebel Held Territory
The Social Terrain of Rebel Held Territory
复制标题
叛军控制区的社会地形
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Jori Breslawski
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jori Breslawski
叛军控制地区的地方秩序程度差异很大，有的完全混乱，有的管理机构运作良好。当这些机构存在时，为什么有些机构让平民参与地方事务，而另一些机构则将平民排除在治理之外？我认为，叛乱分子根据居住在该领土的平民居民的某些特征，选择不同的治理策略，以最大限度地发挥其领土控制的效用。叛乱分子的选区决定了叛乱分子是寻求统治平民还是仅通过强制暴力来控制他们，而社区凝聚力（或缺乏凝聚力）则决定了叛乱分子发展的机构类型。我关注叛乱分子控制下的社区的三种不同结果——无机构、排他性机构和包容性机构。我使用历史、统计和案例证据来检验我的论点，利用有关叛军控制地区当地秩序的原始跨国数据以及对印度尼西亚亚齐省村长、前战斗人员和社区成员的采访。
The extent of local order varies widely in rebel held areas, from total chaos to well-run governing institutions. When these institutions exist, why do some include civilian input in local affairs, while others exclude civilians from governance? I argue that rebels choose different governing strategies that maximize their utility of territorial control, based on certain characteristics of civilian inhabitants populating the territory. Rebels’ constituency determines whether rebels seek to govern civilians or control them solely with coercive violence, and community cohesion (or lack thereof) then determines the type of institutions that rebels develop. I focus on three different outcomes for communities under rebel control—no institutions, exclusive institutions, and inclusive institutions. I test my argument using historical, statistical, and case evidence, leveraging original cross-national data on local order in rebel held territory as well as interviews with village heads, ex-combatants, and community members in Aceh, Indonesia.