An Evaluation of the ELNP e-Learning Quality Assurance Program: Perspectives of Gap Analysis and Innovation Diffusion
An Evaluation of the ELNP e-Learning Quality Assurance Program: Perspectives of Gap Analysis and Innovation Diffusion
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ming-Puu Chen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ming-Puu Chen
本研究的目的是从参与者的角度审查全国电子学习质量保证框架的适当性。两种类型的质量评估计划，包括电子学习服务认证计划（eLSC）和电子学习课程认证计划（eLCC）在这项研究中进行了检查。本研究以差距分析与创新属性探讨参与者对品质架构的认知差距与态度。分析表明，质量框架具有较好的信度和效度。差距分析显示，eLSC和eLCC的参与者认为他们的电子学习的质量过度。态度分析结果显示：（a）eLCC的正面可观察性和可观察性的提高有助于提高参与者对eLCC的采用;（B）eLCC的正面可观察性、相对优势和兼容性有助于促进和维持eLCC的采用;（c）eLCC的可试验性/复杂性和相对优势的降低表明需要进一步改进。明确的质量标准的描述和例子，建议使质量保证框架更亲切，更容易获得电子学习开发人员和组织。
The purpose of this study was to examine the appropriateness of a nationwide quality assurance framework for e-learning from participants’ perspectives. Two types of quality evaluation programs were examined in this study, including the e-Learning Service Certification program (eLSC) and the e-Learning Courseware Certification program (eLCC). Gap analysis and the innovation attributes were employed to examine participants’ perception gaps and attitudes toward the quality framework. The analysis showed that the quality framework obtained adequate validity and reliability. Gap analysis revealed that both the eLSC and eLCC participants perceived the quality of their e-learning overly. The attitude analysis revealed that a) for eLSC, the positive and increased observability was inferred to enhance participants’ adoption of eLSC, b) for eLCC, the positive attributes of observability, relative advantage and compatibility were inferred to facilitate and sustain the adoption of eLCC, c) the decreased attributes of trialability/complexity and relative advantage of eLCC indicated the necessity for further improvement. Crystal-clear descriptions and examples of quality criteria are suggested to make the quality assurance framework more amiable and easy of access to e-learning developers and organizations.