Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition.

Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.003
复制
发表时间:
2005-02
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
M. Vitevitch;P. Luce
M. Vitevitch;P. Luce
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Vitevitch;P. Luce

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Lipinski和Gupta(2005)报告了12个实验和大量分析的结果,这些实验和分析试图进一步检验最初在Vitevitch和吕斯(1998)中报告的趋声概率的影响,并在Vitevitch和吕斯(1999)中进一步探讨。他们认为,维特维奇和吕斯的结果是由于刺激持续时间的差异,而不是由于声定位概率的差异。本报告描述了另一个非词命名实验的结果,采用了一套新的持续时间匹配的刺激,表现出促进作用的phonotactic概率以上和超过刺激持续时间。目前的结果支持Vitevitch和吕斯最初的说法。Lipinski和Gupta的数据和本报告中的数据之间的差异的可能来源进行了讨论。虽然许多因素可能介导的促进作用的phonotactic概率上的非词重复潜伏期,我们相信仍然有足够的证据来支持这样的说法,即增加phonotactic概率的非词与减少非词处理时间,即使刺激持续时间是受控的。
Lipinski and Gupta (2005) report the results of 12 experiments and numerous analyses that attempted to examine further the effects of phonotactic probability originally reported in Vitevitch and Luce (1998, and further explored in Vitevitch & Luce 1999). They suggested that Vitevitch and Luce’s results were due to differences in the duration of the stimuli rather than to differences in phonotactic probability. The present report describes the results from another nonword naming experiment—employing a new set of duration-matched stimuli—that demonstrate a facilitative effect of phonotactic probability above and beyond that of stimulus duration. The current results provide support for Vitevitch and Luce’s original claims. Possible sources of the discrepancies between Lipinski and Gupta’s data and those in the present report are discussed. Although many factors may mediate the facilitative effect of phonotactic probability on nonword repetition latency, we believe there is still sufficient evidence to support the claim that increases in phonotactic probability for nonwords are associated with decreases in nonword processing times, even when stimulus duration is controlled.