Enhancing the Modal Split in Paramaribo Through Design-Driven Participatory Action Research Fuelled by Urban Tactics
Enhancing the Modal Split in Paramaribo Through Design-Driven Participatory Action Research Fuelled by Urban Tactics
复制标题
通过城市策略推动的设计驱动的参与性行动研究，加强帕拉马里博的模式划分
作者：
Sam Rymenants;Marlies Struyf;S. Heirman;M. Goethals
从依赖汽车的城市环境向均衡的模式划分发展，似乎没有“一刀切”的战略。为特定环境寻求适当的流动战略可以被视为寻求适当的治理战略。本文探讨了机会的设计驱动的参与式行动研究（DD-PAR）作为一种治理战略，以提高流动性的背景下，治理薄弱，通过调查一个单一的案例研究在帕拉马里博北，苏里南。尽管有各种计划、设计和政策建议，但喀麦隆公共当局仍在努力改善流动性。尽管作出了许多努力，但庇护主义和赞助正在削弱政府的权力，导致公共倡议无法实施。此外，很少有民间社会组织为这种薄弱的公共权力辩护。这造成了一种情况，即政府和民间社会都没有足够的能力实现帕拉马里博的模式转变。治理战略取决于强有力的政府或积极主动的民间社会（例如，因此，基于行为者的战略是不合适的。相比之下，DD-PAR似乎有潜力作为一种治理战略，因为它利用研究和学术力量来创造社会热情，建立行动者网络，并产生行动。本案例研究确定了建立行为者网络的关键行为者和先决条件。它还提供了试探性的见解，城市战术，增加政府的压力，提供足够的基础设施和政策，以适应新开发的行动，支持更多样化的模式分裂。
There appears to be no “one-size-fits-all” strategy for evolving from a car-dependent urban environment towards a well-balanced modal split. The search for a suitable mobility strategy for a particular setting can be framed as seeking a suitable governance strategy. This article explores the opportunities of design-driven participatory action research (DD-PAR) as a governance strategy for improving mobility within a context of weak governance by investigating a single case study conducted in Paramaribo North, Suriname. Despite available plans, designs, and policy proposals, Surinamese public authorities are struggling to improve mobility. Notwithstanding many efforts, clientelism and patronage are weakening the power of the government, resulting in unimplemented public initiatives. Moreover, there are few civil society organisations to advocate for this weak public power. This creates a context in which neither the government nor civil society is sufficiently equipped to realise the modal shift in Paramaribo. Governance strategies depending on strong government or proactive civil society (e.g., actor-based strategies) are thus not suitable. In contrast, DD-PAR appears to have potential as a governance strategy, as it uses research and academics as forces to create societal enthusiasm, establish actor networks, and generate action. The current case study identifies key actors and preconditions for building a network of actors. It also provides tentative insights into urban tactics for increasing pressure on the government to provide adequate infrastructure and policy to accommodate newly developed action that supports a more diverse modal split.