Security in ambiguity - Towards a radical security politics
Security in ambiguity - Towards a radical security politics
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1362480604046660
复制
发表时间：
2004-11-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Virta, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
De Lint, W;Virta, S
在本文中，我们提出了安全的重新概念，试图协调后批判和规范议程。本文首先剖析了主流安全话语的特征，然后将这个问题重新置于激进的政治中。我们认为，在这个问题上取得进展需要拒绝安全性、确定性和权威之间的联系。我们没有遵循古典现实主义的观点，即安全需要政治的例外，而是选择将安全视为依赖于政治不确定性。借鉴汉尼宁的政治“生活在模糊性中”的观点，并借鉴后福柯反对暴政暴力的思想，我们主张以减少伤害为基础的安全领域持续的再政治化。我们提供“模糊性中的安全性”作为这种综合的概念化。
In this article we offer a reconceptualization of security that attempts to reconcile a post-critical and normative agenda. The article proceeds by unpacking features of the dominant security discourse and then resituating the question in a radical politics. We contend that moving forward on this question requires a rejection of the association between security, certainty and authority. Rather than following the classical realist view that security requires exceptions from politics, we choose to see security as dependent on political uncertainty. Borrowing from Hanninen's idea that politics is 'living with ambiguity' and taking from post-Foucauldian thought against the violence of tyranny, we advocate the ongoing repoliticization of the security field informed by harm reduction. We offer 'security in ambiguity' as a conceptualization of this synthesis.