Auditory and visual naming tests: Normative and patient data for accuracy, response time, and tip-of-the-tongue
Auditory and visual naming tests: Normative and patient data for accuracy, response time, and tip-of-the-tongue
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s135561770393013x
复制
发表时间：
2003-03-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Seidel, WT
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hamberger, MJ;Seidel, WT
命名通常用视觉命名任务来评估，然而，一些真正有找词困难的患者(在基于听觉的话语中很明显)在这种测量上表现出很小的困难。来自皮质地形图、大脑成像和神经心理学研究的证据表明，听觉命名测量可能提供更相关的信息，或者至少是补充信息。我们开发了类似的听觉和视觉命名测试，并提供了基于100个对照的准确性、反应时间和舌尖反应的标准数据。左侧颞叶癫痫(TLE)患者(即有预期命名困难的人群)在听觉但不是视觉命名方面的表现比右侧TLE患者(即没有预期命名困难的人群)更差，这一发现支持了测试的有效性。内部信度系数和重测信度系数都是合理的。最后，测试效用是以个体为基础进行评估的，听觉而不是视觉命名的表现可以预测损伤。
Naming is typically assessed with visual naming tasks, yet, some patients with genuine word-finding difficulty (evident in auditorily based discourse) show minimal difficulty on such measures. Evidence from cortical mapping, brain imaging and neuropsychological studies suggests that auditory naming measures might provide more relevant or at least, complementary information. We developed comparable auditory and visual naming tests and present normative data for accuracy, response time, and tip-of-the-tongue responses based on 100 controls. Test validity was supported by findings that left temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients (i.e., a population with expected naming difficulty) performed more poorly on auditory but not visual naming compared to right TLE patients (i.e., a population without expected naming difficulty). Internal and test-retest reliability coefficients were reasonable. Finally, test utility was assessed on an individual basis, and auditory but not visual naming performance predicted impairment.