Physica Sacra: Wunder, Naturwissenschaft und historischer Schriftsinn zwischen Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit
Physica Sacra: Wunder, Naturwissenschaft und historischer Schriftsinn zwischen Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit
复制标题
Physica Sacra：中世纪和近代早期的奇迹、自然科学和历史写作
DOI：
10.1163/9789004258075
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Roling
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Roling
吞下约拿的是鲸鱼还是鲨鱼？耶利哥的城墙是如何倒塌的？在他涉猎广泛的著作《神圣的物理学》中，贝恩德·罗林表明，自然科学和圣经训诂学并不总是完全对立的。从中世纪鼎盛时期开始，像阿尔伯图斯·马格努斯和阿隆索·托斯塔多这样的圣经评论家广泛利用他们那个时代关于动物学、医学和天文学的知识来解释启示的奇迹，并捍卫他们的历史基础。即使在现代圣经批判的出现和启蒙运动的时代，正如这里所详细展示的，他们的论点也足够有效，足以反驳像斯宾诺莎，艾萨克·德·拉·佩尔孔特和伏尔泰这样的批评家。
Was it a whale or a shark that devoured Jonah? And how were the walls of Jericho brought down? In his wide-ranging study, Physica Sacra, Bernd Roling shows that the natural sciences and biblical exegesis have not always stood in stark opposition to one another. From the high Middle Ages, Bible commentators such as Albertus Magnus and Alonso Tostado made extensive use of the knowledge available in their times about zoology, medicine and astronomy to explain the wonders of revelation and to defend their historical basis. Even with the advent of modern Biblical criticism and in the age of Enlightenment, as is shown here in detail, their arguments were valid enough to refute critics like Spinoza, Isaac de la Peyrère and Voltaire.