The way of the future?
The way of the future?
复制标题
作者:
W. Hersh
There is a growing concern among scientists that research results are controlled by an increasingly small number of publishers who have great control over the marketplace. This monopoly, however, is indirectly supported by scientists themselves, who aim to publish in the most prestigious and wellcited journals and need those publications to obtain promotion and grant funding. A related concern is that governments fund most basic research, individual scientists perform it, and then reports of the results are handed over to publishers who assume the copyright and sell it back to those very governments and scientists. Because many scientific journals are costly, accessing them is increasingly beyond the reach of both individuals and libraries, the latter of whom are increasingly strapped financially. These concerns have been addressed by a number of individuals and organizations. In 1999, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced an initiative, E-Biomed, later renamed PubMed Central (PMC), which would provide a repository of scientific research papers that could be accessed free over the World Wide Web. The proposal met with much controversy, especially the part, later dropped, that proposed an additional repository of papers before peer review.After considerable debate—and some retrenching on the part of NIH—PMC has gone live and currently has about a dozen journals available (www. pubmedcentral. gov). One restriction whose relaxation has led to more journals joining the PMC initiative has been the abandonment of the requirement for articles to be physically located on the PMC site. Now journal publishers need only provide links to PMC and keep their papers on their own sites. Some view the PMC model as an extension of the approach used by GenBank, where data from genomics research are made widely accessible.