‘A great space of murmurings’
‘A great space of murmurings’
复制标题
“一片窃窃私语的大空间”
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Philo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Philo
在福柯的名著《疯狂与文明》（Madness and Civilization）出版50周年之际，本文探讨了这本书在不同版本之间的变化，在这个过程中，它失去了它的现象学内涵和关于疯狂所揭示的真理的“浪漫主义”。福柯自己否认这些元素的原因被认为是，并考虑在一起-结合一个关键的传记的书与关注福柯的反应，它-这篇文章时尚的一面镜子，以保持在当代人文地理学的某些电流。有人认为，“浪漫的幻想”渗透到原来的书，如果不是压倒它，有显着的回声在“浪漫的姿态”显示了一些当今的地理学家。因此，老福柯与他早期的浪漫主义的距离对于批评人文地理学近代史的学者来说是有启发性的，但也可能有理由声称完全失去这种浪漫主义及其现象学相关性是错误的。
Prompted by the 50th anniversary of the first publication of Foucault’s famous book commonly known in English as Madness and Civilization, this essay explores how the book has changed between versions, in the process losing what can be cast as both its phenomenological undertones and a ‘romanticism’ about the truths supposedly revealed by madness. Reasons for Foucault’s own disavowal of these elements are considered, and taken together – conjoining a critical biography of the book with attention to Foucault’s reactions to it – this essay fashions a mirror to hold up to certain currents within contemporary human geography. It is argued that the ‘romantic fantasy’ which permeates the original book, if not overwhelming it, has significant echoes in the ‘romantic gesture’ displayed by some present-day geographers. The older Foucault’s distancing from his earlier romanticism is hence instructive for scholars critiquing the recent history of human geography, but there may also be grounds for claiming that it would be mistaken to lose this romanticism, together with its phenomenological correlates, entirely.