DISORGANIZATION OF BEHAVIOR AFTER FRONTAL-LOBE DAMAGE
DISORGANIZATION OF BEHAVIOR AFTER FRONTAL-LOBE DAMAGE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/02643298608253360
复制
发表时间：
1986-08-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
DUNCAN, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DUNCAN, J
本文提出了额叶损伤后活动紊乱的理论。这种混乱的特点是行动的顺序支离破碎，相关部分被省略，无关部分被引入。在比安奇(1922)和卢里亚(1966)之后，目的的作用提出了一个缺陷：通过其预期的结果来控制行动。从人和机器问题解决的概念来阐述这一思想。然后试图展示额叶损伤的哪些方面与该理论的评估有关。最重要的是损害的普遍性--它出现在一系列信息处理领域和任务组成部分--特别是围绕未能实现已知目标的详细行为。我认为，这些应该构成这种障碍的功能特征的基础。重要的一点是，提出的理论功能--寻找一种优化实现所列目标的行动结构--只是影响行为组织的一个因素。另一种是在熟悉的环境中重复熟悉的动作序列。这可能对应于区分两种处理模式的共同想法，即主动/受控和被动/自动。
This paper presents a theory of the disorganisation in activity that can follow frontal lobe damage. This disorganisation is characterised by fragmented sequences of action, relevant parts being omitted and irrelevant parts introduced. Following Bianchi (1922) and Luria (1966), a defect is proposed in the role of purpose: control of action by its intended result. Concepts from human and machine problem solving are used to elaborate this idea. An attempt is then made to show which aspects of frontal impairment are relevant to assessment of the theory. Of most importance are the generality of impairment—its appearance across the range of information-processing domains and task components—and in particular the detailed behaviour surrounding failure to achieve known goals. These, I suggest, should form the basis of a functional characterisation of the disorder. An important point is that the theoretical function proposed—search for a structure of action optimising achievement of listed goals—is only one factor influencing the organisation of behaviour. Another is the repetition of familiar sequences of action in familiar settings. This may correspond to the common idea of a distinction between two modes of processing, active/controlled and passive/automatic.