Systematic debriefing after qualitative encounters: an essential analysis step in applied qualitative research.
Systematic debriefing after qualitative encounters: an essential analysis step in applied qualitative research.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000837
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
8.1
通讯作者：
Winch PJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McMahon SA;Winch PJ
关于全球公共卫生方案规划中的定性研究和定性数据分析的对话往往强调数据收集的产品（录音、文字记录、编码簿和编码），而对数据收集过程的关注相对较少。然而，在定性研究中，数据收集者的技能决定了数据的质量，因此在收集数据时了解数据收集者的优势和劣势可以使研究人员提高数据收集者的能力和数据的实用性。本文定义并讨论了系统汇报的过程。汇报需要在收集数据后立即进行全面的、以目标为导向的讨论。随着数据收集的进展，汇报会采取不同的形式，实现略有不同的目的。从我们在坦桑尼亚和塞拉利昂的卫生系统研究的例子中，我们阐明了汇报如何使我们能够：提高数据收集者的技能;立即了解数据的内容;在当地环境中不可预见的变化和挑战中纠正方向;加强真实的数据的质量和可信度;并迅速与方案、政策和学术领域的利益攸关方分享新数据。我们希望这篇文章提供指导，并激发讨论的方法，定性数据收集和机制，以进一步概述和完善在定性研究的汇报。
Conversations regarding qualitative research and qualitative data analysis in global public health programming often emphasize the product of data collection (audio recordings, transcripts, codebooks and codes), while paying relatively less attention to the process of data collection. In qualitative research, however, the data collector’s skills determine the quality of the data, so understanding data collectors’ strengths and weaknesses as data are being collected allows researchers to enhance both the ability of data collectors and the utility of the data. This paper defines and discusses a process for systematic debriefings. Debriefings entail thorough, goal-oriented discussion of data immediately after it is collected. Debriefings take different forms and fulfill slightly different purposes as data collection progresses. Drawing from examples in our health systems research in Tanzania and Sierra Leone, we elucidate how debriefings have allowed us to: enhance the skills of data collectors; gain immediate insights into the content of data; correct course amid unforeseen changes and challenges in the local context; strengthen the quality and trustworthiness of data in real time; and quickly share emerging data with stakeholders in programmatic, policy and academic spheres. We hope this article provides guidance and stimulates discussion on approaches to qualitative data collection and mechanisms to further outline and refine debriefings in qualitative research.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Scott, Kerry;McMahon, Shannon;George, Asha
通讯作者：
George, Asha
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Tobin, GA;Begley, CM
通讯作者：
Begley, CM
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
McMahon, Shannon A.;Kennedy, Caitlin E.;Winch, Peter J.;Kombe, Miriam;Killewo, Japhet;Kilewo, Charles
通讯作者：
Kilewo, Charles
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
McMahon, Shannon A.;George, Asha S.;Winch, Peter J.
通讯作者：
Winch, Peter J.
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
McMahon SA;Chase RP;Winch PJ;Chebet JJ;Besana GVR;Mosha I;Sheweji Z;Kennedy CE
通讯作者：
Kennedy CE