Defining and assessing the transformational nature of smart city governance: insights from four European cases
Defining and assessing the transformational nature of smart city governance: insights from four European cases
复制标题
定义和评估智慧城市治理的变革性质：来自四个欧洲案例的见解
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Giorgia Nesti
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Giorgia Nesti
智慧城市是一种新的城市发展方式，其基础是广泛使用信息和通信技术，促进环境可持续性、经济发展和创新。本文旨在讨论采用智慧城市方法是否需要改变现有的制度结构和管理实践。为此，我们分析了欧洲智慧城市的四个案例：阿姆斯特丹、巴塞罗那、都灵和维也纳。本文描述了他们的治理模式，调查了其政府结构中发生的转型水平，概述了主要缺陷，并确定了与新公共治理新兴范式的可能联系。实践者要点 本文深入探讨了如何在实践中实施智慧治理。它概述了城市治理的智慧城市模式，作为具体目标、利益相关者之间的关系、政策风格和政策工具的结果。智能治理需要采用基于实验的新方法、与所有当地利益相关者的合作以及现有政府结构的重组。这一过程应由公共行为者推动，并应得到适当工具的支持，以管理互动、促进协调、增强民主合法性和问责制，并确保为公民带来切实成果。
Smart cities are a new approach to urban development based on the extensive use of information and communication technologies and on the promotion of environmental sustainability, economic development and innovation. The article is aimed at discussing whether the adoption of a smart city approach entails the transformation of existing institutional structures and administrative practices. To this end, four cases of European smart cities are analysed: Amsterdam, Barcelona, Turin and Vienna. The article describes their models of governance, investigates the level of transformation that occurred in their governmental structures, outlines the main drawbacks and identifies possible connections with the emergent paradigm of the New Public Governance. Points for practitioners The article offers in-depth insights about how smart governance is implemented in practice. It outlines the smart city model of urban governance as the result of specific goals, relationships among stakeholders, policy styles and policy tools. Smart governance entails the adoption of a new approach based on experimentation, collaboration with all local stakeholders and the reorganisation of existing government structures. This process should be driven by public actors and should be supported by appropriate tools to manage interactions, to foster coordination, to enhance democratic legitimacy and accountability, and to ensure tangible results for citizens.