Student retention: Why is there a gap between the majority of research findings and school practice?
Student retention: Why is there a gap between the majority of research findings and school practice?
复制标题
学生保留率：为什么大多数研究结果与学校实践之间存在差距？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1997
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Susan Allan Galis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Kenneth Tanner;Susan Allan Galis
保留对儿童有益还是有害？与研究结果相反，许多教育工作者把留住儿童作为早期干预措施，并声称取得了积极成果。那么，为什么研究结果与实践之间存在明显的差距呢？也许存在差距是因为人们可能会被教育研究误导，其中一些研究是有偏见的，过于热心。在回顾了保留问题的范围后，我们认为保留孩子重复不成功的经历是完全不合适的;但是保留孩子的重点和资源来纠正有据可查的个别问题可能是非常合适的。一些新兴的干预措施，可能被证明比保留更好。John Wiley & Sons，Inc.
Does retention help or harm children? Contrary to research findings, many educators retain children as an early intervention and claim positive results. So why is there an apparent gap between research findings and practice? Perhaps the gap exists because people may be misled through educational research, some of which is biased and excessively zealous. After reviewing the scope of the problem of retention, we theorize that retaining the child to repeat an unsuccessful experience is totally inappropriate; but retaining the child with a focus and resources to correct well documented, individual problems may be extremely appropriate. Some emerging interventions, may prove to be much better than retention. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.