Time to stop the exploitation of free academic labour
Time to stop the exploitation of free academic labour
复制标题
是时候停止对免费学术劳动的剥削了
DOI：
10.31235/osf.io/6quxg
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Tennant
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Tennant
商业出版社继续赚取无限利润，同时通过同行评议剥削研究人员的免费劳动。如果出版商在资本主义制度下为自己增加的价值获得经济补偿，那么所有其他增加价值的人，包括评论家，也应该获得经济补偿。我建议，同行评议应包括作为一个专业服务的研究机构与商业出版商的合同。这将有助于认识到同行审查的价值，并开始将其塑造成一种功能性的质量控制形式。
Commercial publishing houses continue to make unbounded profits while exploiting the free labour of researchers through peer review. If publishers are to be compensated financially for the value that they add within a capitalist system, then so should all others who add value, including reviewers. I propose that peer review should be included as a professional service by research institutes in their contracts with commercial publishers. This would help to recognize the value of peer review, and begin to shape it into a functional form of quality control.