Microclass Mobility: Social Reproduction in Four Countries1
Microclass Mobility: Social Reproduction in Four Countries1
复制标题
微课流动性：四个国家的社会再生产1
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
M. Brinton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jan O. Jonsson;D. Grusky;M. Di Carlo;Reinhard Pollak;M. Brinton
在关于社会流动的社会学文献中，长期以来的惯例是假设代际再生产采取两种形式之一：一种是父母将大阶级地位传给子女的分类形式，另一种是父母将社会经济地位传给子女的分级形式。这些方法以其自身的方式忽视了职业在将机会从一代人转移到下一代人方面所发挥的重要作用。在对来自美国、瑞典、德国和日本的全国代表性数据的新分析中，作者表明：（a）职业是社会再生产的重要渠道;（B）只有在职业层面进行分析时，流动制度中最极端的僵化才能被揭示出来，以及（c）在传统流动性分析中表现为大阶级生殖的大部分内容实际上是变相的职业生殖。
In the sociological literature on social mobility, the long‐standing convention has been to assume that intergenerational reproduction takes one of two forms: a categorical form that has parents passing on a big‐class position to their children or a gradational form that has parents passing on their socioeconomic standing. These approaches ignore in their own ways the important role that occupations play in transferring opportunities from one generation to the next. In new analyses of nationally representative data from the United States, Sweden, Germany, and Japan, the authors show that (a) occupations are an important conduit for social reproduction, (b) the most extreme rigidities in the mobility regime are only revealed when analyses are carried out at the occupational level, and (c) much of what shows up as big‐class reproduction in conventional mobility analyses is in fact occupational reproduction in disguise.