Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A prospective cohort study
Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A prospective cohort study
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jns.2016.09.035
复制
发表时间:
2016-11-15
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Cui, Li-ying
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xu, Yan;Wang, Qian;Cui, Li-ying
Aims: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclophosphamide (CTX) in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).Methods: We performed a prospective cohort analysis of relapses, disability, and adverse events in NMOSD patients treated with AZA, MMF, or CTX (n = 119, 38, and 41, respectively). All the patients were co-treated with oral prednisone.Results: A significant reduction in relapse rate was found in patients taking AZA (p < 0.001), MMF (p < 0.001) or CTX (p = 0.01). MMF was associated with a lower risk of relapse than AZA, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). AZA and MMF decreased the mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores significantly (AZA: p = 0.02; MMF: p = 0.01), whereas CTX did not. Compared with AZA, MMF had a significantly lower risk of treatment discontinuation due to drug-related adverse events (p = 0.02), whereas CTX had a comparable risk (p = 0.35).Conclusions: MMF is a good first-line treatment option for NMOSD and AZA remains a valuable first-line drug if its side effects are tolerable while CTX can be a treatment option for patients who cannot tolerate AZA and MMF. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.