Biosecurity, Expertise and the Institutional Void: The Case of Bovine Tuberculosis
Biosecurity, Expertise and the Institutional Void: The Case of Bovine Tuberculosis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00496.x
复制
发表时间：
2009-10-01
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Franklin, Alex
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Enticott, Gareth;Franklin, Alex
本文探讨了生物安全政策与农村差异化之间的联系。它试图说明生物安全政策是如何从根本上受到决策游戏规则的不确定性的影响-Hajer称之为“制度真空”。特别是，这篇文章试图展示这种空白如何创造了一个新的政治空间，在这个空间中，处理动物疾病的传统做法受到了挑战和重塑。这方面的关键是伙伴关系的讨论，使新的行为者和专门知识形式能够在新的空间尺度上构建不同的生物安保方法。这些行动使疾病控制的新空间合法化，从而促进了农村的差异化。本文使用的案例研究的政策试图控制牛结核病在英格兰和威尔士的传播。
This article explores the links between biosecurity policy and rural differentiation. It attempts to show how biosecurity policy has been fundamentally affected by uncertainty over the rules of the game of policy-making - what Hajer has called the 'institutional void'. In particular, the article attempts to show how this void has created a new political space in which the traditional practices of dealing with animal disease have been challenged and reshaped. Crucial to this is a discourse of partnership that permits new actors and forms of expertise to construct different approaches to biosecurity at new spatial scales. These actions legitimate a new spatiality of disease control, thereby contributing to the differentiation of the countryside. The article uses a case-study of policy attempts to control the spread of bovine tuberculosis in England and Wales.