A historical and critical analysis of park prescriptions
A historical and critical analysis of park prescriptions
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00222216.2019.1617647
复制
发表时间：
2019-08-08
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Battista, Rebecca A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
James, J. Joy;Christiana, Richard W.;Battista, Rebecca A.
公园处方（PP）是一个草根运动，鼓励医生给病人开公园处方，促进公园和人的健康。然而，关于PP提高参与者健康结果的能力，我们所知甚少。虽然一些人热情地将私人诊所视为提供医疗服务的一种形式，但其他人质疑缺乏证据来支持撰写非医疗处方。需要对PP运动的历史和相关研究进行批判性分析，不仅可以推动其研究议程，还可以帮助其将公园和自然区域视为医疗保健系统的一个可接受的整体部分。作者认为，为了推进公园和自然环境的PP理念，有必要开展跨学科讨论，重点关注PP的历史、合作以及制定统一的研究议程。
Park Prescription (PP) is a grassroots movement encouraging physicians to prescribe parks to patients, promoting healthy parks and people. However, little is known specifically about PP's ability to increase participant health outcomes. While some enthusiastically see PPs as a form of delivering a medical treatment, others question the lack of evidence to support writing a nonmedical prescription. A critical analysis of the PP movement's history and related research is needed to not only drive its research agenda but also to assist in its desire to see parks and natural areas as an accepted and holistic part of the health care system. The authors believe an interdisciplinary discussion focusing on PP history, its collaborations, and setting a unified research agenda is necessary to moving forward the idea of PPs for parks and natural settings.