Phase I trial of the oral PARP inhibitor olaparib in combination with paclitaxel for first- or second-line treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
Phase I trial of the oral PARP inhibitor olaparib in combination with paclitaxel for first- or second-line treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1186/bcr3484
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Carmichael J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dent RA;Lindeman GJ;Clemons M;Wildiers H;Chan A;McCarthy NJ;Singer CF;Lowe ES;Watkins CL;Carmichael J
This Phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability and efficacy of olaparib, a potent oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Eligible patients who had received ≤1 prior cytotoxic regimen for mTNBC were treated with olaparib 200 mg bid continuously plus weekly paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 for three weeks per four-week cycle. Dose modifications in a large proportion of patients due to neutropenia resulted in enrollment of a second cohort of patients who, if they experienced grade ≥2 neutropenia in cycle 1, received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, which was continued prophylactically in subsequent cycles. All patients had measurable disease; tumor responses were evaluated according to RECIST (version 1.0). Nineteen patients (cohort 1, n = 9; cohort 2, n = 10) received treatment; 15 had received prior taxane chemotherapy. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea (n = 12, 63%), nausea (n = 11, 58%) and neutropenia (n = 11, 58%). Seven neutropenia events were reported in cohort 1 (four grade ≥3) and four in cohort 2 (two grade ≥3, including one event of febrile neutropenia). The median (range) dose intensity of paclitaxel was 57% (26 to 100%) in cohort 1 and 73% (29 to 100%) in cohort 2. Seven patients (37%) had a confirmed partial response; one patient remains on olaparib monotherapy without progression. The combination of olaparib and weekly paclitaxel was complicated by a significant clinical interaction, with higher-than-expected rates of neutropenia despite secondary prophylaxis. Given the encouraging response rate, alternative scheduling and dosing strategies should be considered (funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00707707).
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
Perez, EA;Vogel, CL;Patel, R
通讯作者:
Patel, R
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
Fong, Peter C.;Yap, Timothy A.;Kaye, Stan B.
通讯作者:
Kaye, Stan B.
影响因子:
50.5
作者:
Andre, F.;Zielinski, C. C.
通讯作者:
Zielinski, C. C.
影响因子:
11.2
作者:
Kummar S;Chen A;Ji J;Zhang Y;Reid JM;Ames M;Jia L;Weil M;Speranza G;Murgo AJ;Kinders R;Wang L;Parchment RE;Carter J;Stotler H;Rubinstein L;Hollingshead M;Melillo G;Pommier Y;Bonner W;Tomaszewski JE;Doroshow JH
通讯作者:
Doroshow JH
DOI:
10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-2425
发表时间:
2012-04-15
期刊:
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
影响因子:
--
作者:
Rajan A;Carter CA;Kelly RJ;Gutierrez M;Kummar S;Szabo E;Yancey MA;Ji J;Mannargudi B;Woo S;Spencer S;Figg WD;Giaccone G
通讯作者:
Giaccone G