The Woman as Slave in Nineteenth-Century American Social Movements

The Woman as Slave in Nineteenth-Century American Social Movements
复制标题

十九世纪美国社会运动中的奴隶妇女

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-030-24467-5
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
1
通讯作者:
A. Stevenson
A. Stevenson
中科院分区:
人文科学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Stevenson

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在世界各地,社会运动已成为地方、国家和全球政治和民间社会中合法但有争议的行为体,但我们对它们的较长历史及其发展轨迹仍然知之甚少。该系列旨在促进对自1750年左右以来的现代社会运动史的创新历史研究。我们汇集了概念上知情的研究,分析从早期现代到现在的劳工运动,新社会运动和其他形式的抗议。我们在最广泛的意义上设想“社会运动”,包括介于正式组织和纯粹抗议活动之间的社会形态。我们还提供了一个家的研究,系统地探讨政治,社会,经济和文化条件,其中社会运动可以出现。我们对社会运动历史的跨国和全球视角特别感兴趣,并在批判性和创造性地与政治,社会和社会学理论进行研究,以便对社会运动进行历史性的论证。这个新系列旨在提供关于社会运动的创新历史工作,同时也有助于历史化“社会运动”的概念。它希望重振历史学家和历史社会学家之间的对话,分析查尔斯蒂利所谓的“竞争的动力”。
Around the world, social movements have become legitimate, yet contested, actors in local, national and global politics and civil society, yet we still know relatively little about their longer histories and the trajectories of their development. This series seeks to promote innovative historical research on the history of social movements in the modern period since around 1750. We bring together conceptually-informed studies that analyse labour movements, new social movements and other forms of protest from early modernity to the present. We conceive of ‘social movements’ in the broadest possible sense, encompassing social formations that lie between formal organisations and mere protest events. We also offer a home for studies that systematically explore the political, social, economic and cultural conditions in which social movements can emerge. We are especially interested in transnational and global perspectives on the history of social movements, and in studies that engage critically and creatively with political, social and sociological theories in order to make historically grounded arguments about social movements. This new series seeks to offer innovative historical work on social movements, while also helping to historicise the concept of ‘social movement’. It hopes to revitalise the conversation between historians and historical sociologists in analysing what Charles Tilly has called the ‘dynamics of contention’.