Six modes of co-production for sustainability
Six modes of co-production for sustainability
复制标题
DOI：
10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x
复制
发表时间：
2021-08-05
影响因子：
27.6
通讯作者：
Pickering, Tomas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chambers, Josephine M.;Wyborn, Carina;Pickering, Tomas
共同制作包括不同的目的、术语和做法。本研究通过描绘来自6大洲的32个倡议如何在地方到全球范围内共同产生生态系统可持续发展的不同成果来探索这种多样性。共同生产解决复杂的可持续性挑战的承诺是引人注目的。然而，共同制作，研究和实践的协作编织，包含不同的目标，术语和做法，其含义不明确。为了探索这种多样性，我们系统地绘制了来自6大洲的32项倡议如何在地方到全球范围内共同产生生态系统可持续发展的不同结果。我们发现，他们利用共同生产的目的，对权力的理解，对政治的态度和影响途径的变化。聚类分析确定了六种共同制作模式：（1）研究解决方案;（2）赋予声音;（3）经纪人权力;（4）重新构建权力;（5）导航差异和（6）重新构建代理。没有一种模式是理想的;每一种模式都具有实现特定成果的独特潜力，但也带来独特的挑战和风险。我们的分析为研究人员和社会参与者提供了一个启发式工具，以批判性地探索这种多样性，并在共同生产可持续性时有效地进行权衡。
Co-production includes diverse aims, terminologies and practices. This study explores such diversity by mapping differences in how 32 initiatives from 6 continents co-produce diverse outcomes for the sustainable development of ecosystems at local to global scales.The promise of co-production to address complex sustainability challenges is compelling. Yet, co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice, encompasses diverse aims, terminologies and practices, with poor clarity over their implications. To explore this diversity, we systematically mapped differences in how 32 initiatives from 6 continents co-produce diverse outcomes for the sustainable development of ecosystems at local to global scales. We found variation in their purpose for utilizing co-production, understanding of power, approach to politics and pathways to impact. A cluster analysis identified six modes of co-production: (1) researching solutions; (2) empowering voices; (3) brokering power; (4) reframing power; (5) navigating differences and (6) reframing agency. No mode is ideal; each holds unique potential to achieve particular outcomes, but also poses unique challenges and risks. Our analysis provides a heuristic tool for researchers and societal actors to critically explore this diversity and effectively navigate trade-offs when co-producing sustainability.