STUDIES ON NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA. I. HEAT RESISTANCE AND GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND D. SIMULANS
STUDIES ON NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA. I. HEAT RESISTANCE AND GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND D. SIMULANS
复制标题
果蝇自然种群的研究。
DOI:
10.1111/j.1558-5646.1961.tb03125.x
复制
发表时间:
1961
期刊:
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
G. S. Mallah
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Tantawy;G. S. Mallah
Under laboratory conditions quantitative characters in Drosophila, such as body size or fecundity, are very sensitive to environmental changes, e.g., temperature fluctuations or changes in quality or quantity of food. In nature, the same situation is found where changes in annual temperature or humidity affect the type of flora as well as the size of Drosophila fauna. It is well known that there is a correlation between some quantitative characters and the geographical distribution of animals. Thus, the pioneer work of Timofeeff-Ressovsky (1933) showed that strains of Drosophila funebris and Drosophila melanogaster derived from different geographical regions react differently to temperature. Studies on the morphology of wild populations as those reported by Dobzhansky (1937), Reed and Reed (1947) on Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis, Stalker and Carson (1947, 1948 and 1949) on Drosophila robusta, Prevosti (1955) on Drosophila subobscura, demonstrated that wing length and other traits decrease in size with geographical distribution from north to south. The early work of Dobzhansky and his collaborators showed that natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura in different geographical localities differed in the frequency of various inversions in the third chromosome. Further work by Dobzhansky revealed that within one locality, populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura exhibited seasonal variations in respect to the frequency of different inversions. Laboratory investigations designed to test the reaction of various gene arrangements to different temperature conditions have been carried out by Dobzhansky in a series of papers on Drosophila pseudoobscura, Kalmus (1945) on Drosophila melanogaster, Dubinin and Tiniakov (1945) on Drosophila funebris, Moos (1955) and others on Drosophila pseudoobscura, and Spiess (1958) on Drosophila persimilis. They all found that various genotypes react differently to various temperatures. The present study, the first of a projected series dealing with natural populations of Drosophila in the Middle East and surrounding areas, was designed to test an hypothesis concerning the nature of developmental homeostasis. The hypothesis to be tested can be expressed as follows: progeny