The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion
The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion
复制标题
去及物语态的语用学：倒装的功能和类型学方面
作者：
T. Givon
T. Givón se-）. In（ma-）和inverse（in-）同样是语法主语。在基南（Keenan，1975）所考察的语言中也不是这样，在这些语言中，非施事者在去及物从句中--无论是逆句还是被动句--都只是半提升为主体。逆语态和被动语态功能（斯夸米什米什语：雅各布斯，在本卷中;宿务语：佩恩，在本卷中;西班牙语：伊达尔戈，在本卷中）。因此，没有理由假定被动语态和逆语态之间必然存在普遍的关系区别。两者都可以是促销或非促销。对两者来说，晋升是一个类型学变量。
T. Givón se-). In {ma-) and inverse (in-) is equally the grammati cal subject. Nor is it true in the languages surveyed by Keenan (1975), where non-agents in the de-transitive clause—be it inverse or passive—are only semi-promoted to subjecthood. both the inverse and passive voice functions (Squamish: Jacobs, in this vol ume; Cebuano: Payne, in this volume; Spanish: Hidalgo, in this volume). There is thus no reason to assume that a universal relational distinction must exist between the passive voice and the inverse voice. Both can be either promotional or non-promotional. For both, promotionality is a typological variable.