THE GEOGRAPHIC PATHOLOGY OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS *
THE GEOGRAPHIC PATHOLOGY OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS *
复制标题
动脉粥样硬化的地理病理学 *
DOI:
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1968.tb53846.x
复制
发表时间:
1968
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
J. Strong
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. Mcgill;J. Strong
Many investigators have described the severity of atherosclerosis in autopsied persons from various populations. Some have compared atherosclerosis among autopsied persons from several populations. However, grading iiiethods have varied, numbers have often been small, and only a few geographically and ethnically different populations have been compared at one time. In 1959, pathologists from several countries organized a cooperative suryey to secure reliable and comparable data on atherosclerosis from different populations. TABLE 1 shows the names and locations of the pathologists nho participated in the survey and the ethnic groups from which they collected arteries. These pathologists met a t the Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama in Guatemala in 1960, drafted a standard operating protocol of methods for the study, and collected a total of 23,000 cases betiveen 1960 and 1965, The methods were simple. In each laboratory, technicians dissected the coronary arteries and aortas from persons ten to 69 years old autopsied in iiietlicolegal services or large general hospitals. The pathologist then submitted these arteries, along with accessory information, to a central laboratory. In the central lalioratory. we stained the arteries with Sudan IV and repackaged them i n plastic bags. A% team of five pathologists estimated for each artery the percent intinial surface involved by fatty streaks, fibrous plaques, complicated lesions, and calcified lesions. The supervising statistician introduced procedures to stantlardize the grading and to estimate the error of the method. \Ye are aware of the limitations of autopsy material as a source of information about the living population. W e cannot discuss these limitations in detail. but will show how we attempted to reduce bias due to different causes of death. First, we excluded all cases with diseases known to be associated with more severe atherosclerosis, such as coronary heart disease, stroke, hypertension. and diabetes. W e formed four broad cause-of-death categoriesaccidents, cancers, infections, and selected miscellaneous causes. W e then compared each type of atherosclerotic lesion among these four groups within each location, race, sex, and age subgroup. No consistent differences appeared. Therefore, we pooled the four categories into one large group and