Leisure Time and Occupational Physical Activity among Racial or Ethnic Minorities
Leisure Time and Occupational Physical Activity among Racial or Ethnic Minorities
复制标题
DOI：
10.1249/mss.0b013e3181c5ec05
复制
发表时间：
2010-06-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Bustamante, Eduardo E.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Marquez, David X.;Neighbors, Charles J.;Bustamante, Eduardo E.
题名/责任者：Healthology/by J.少数民族的闲暇时间和职业性体育活动。地中海医院。SCI。《体育运动》，第42卷，第6期，第1086-1093页，2010年。目的：非拉丁裔黑人(NLB)和拉丁裔黑人(NLW)区别于非拉丁裔白人(NLW)的因素之一是较高的职业性体力活动(OPA)和较少参与休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)。我们调查了就业个人参加OPA和LTPA的情况，以及OPA和LTPA之间的关系，涉及选定的种族或民族群体和拉丁裔亚群。方法：收集2000~2003年全国健康访谈调查资料。我们将调查参与者分为三组：1)那些没有LTPA的人，2)那些报告了一些LTPA但没有足够的时间和强度来达到推荐指南的人，以及3)那些报告LTPA达到或超过推荐水平的人。我们使用有序Logistic回归来检验在控制可能导致组内差异的社会、经济和人口因素的情况下，NLB和拉丁裔或拉丁裔亚组报告LTPA的可能性是否低于NLW。我们进一步研究了OPA的患病率以及LTPA和OPA之间的关系。结果：在就业人员中，与NLW相比，NLB和拉丁裔报告没有LTPA的人明显更多。报告没有LTPA的人中，拉丁裔的比例最大。此外，研究还发现，与NLW和NLW相比，NLB和NLW相比，拉丁裔从事体力活动的职业明显更多。在有工作的拉丁裔中，古巴人和多米尼加人最有可能报告没有LTPA，墨西哥人从事体力活动的工人比例最高。LTPA与跨种族和拉丁裔亚群从事体力活动没有显著关联。结论：少数民族参与LTPA的比例低于非LW人群，OPA比例高于NLW。OPA不会显著影响在职成年人参加长期生活保障计划。
MARQUEZ, D. X., C. J. NEIGHBORS, and E. E. BUSTAMANTE. Leisure Time and Occupational Physical Activity among Racial or Ethnic Minorities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 1086-1093, 2010. Purpose: One of the factors distinguishing non-Latino blacks (NLB) and Latinos from non-Latino whites (NLW) is higher rates of occupational physical activity (OPA) and less participation in leisure time physical activity (LTPA). We examined participation in OPA and LTPA among employed individuals and the relationship between OPA and LTPA across select racial or ethnic groups and Latino subgroups. Methods: We pooled data from 2000 to 2003 of the National Health Interview Survey. We divided the survey participants into three groups: 1) those with no LTPA, 2) those who reported some LTPA but not for sufficient time and intensity to meet recommended guidelines, and 3) those who reported LTPA at levels that met or exceeded recommendations. We used ordinal logistic regression to examine whether NLB and Latinos or Latino subgroups were less likely to report LTPA than NLW while controlling for social, economic, and demographic factors that may have accounted for group differences. We further examined the prevalence of OPA and the relationship between LTPA and OPA. Results: Among employed individuals, NLB and Latinos had significantly more individuals reporting no LTPA compared with NLW. Latinos had the greatest proportion of individuals reporting no LTPA. Furthermore, it was found that significantly more Latinos had physically active occupations compared with NLB and NLB compared with NLW, respectively. Among employed Latinos, Cubans and Dominicans were most likely to report no LTPA, and Mexicans had the greatest percentage of workers with a physically active occupation. LTPA was not significantly associated with having a physically active occupation across races and Latino subgroups. Conclusions: Participation in LTPA among ethnic or racial minorities is lower than that of NLW, and the OPA rates are higher. OPA does not significantly impact participation in LTPA in employed adults.