Reducing intergroup bias: elements of intergroup cooperation.

Reducing intergroup bias: elements of intergroup cooperation.
复制标题

减少群体间偏见:群体间合作的要素。

DOI:
10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.388
复制
发表时间:
1999
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
Houlette,M
Houlette,M
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gaertner,SL;Dovidio,JF;Rust,MC;Nier,JA;Banker,BS;Ward,CM;Mottola,GR;Houlette,M

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

作者研究了群体间合作、互动和共同命运的两个要素的潜在可分离的贡献,以及它们可以运作的过程。操纵的互动减少偏见的评价评级,这支持的想法,这些组成部分是可分离的,而操纵的共同命运时,团体的互动与较低的偏见在非言语面部反应的贡献组内和组外成员。然而,互动激活了几个过程,可以导致减少偏见,包括非范畴化,与常见的群体内身份模型(SL Gaertner,JF Dovidio,PA Anastasio,BA Bachman和MC Rust,1993)以及M。Hewstone和RJ Brown(1986)的组分化模型,主要的中介物集涉及参与者对成员资格的表示,作为一个上级实体内的2个亚组。
The authors examined the potentially separable contributions of 2 elements of intergroup cooperation, interaction and common fate, and the processes through which they can operate. The manipulation of interaction reduced bias in evaluative ratings, which supports the idea that these components are separable, whereas the manipulation of common fate when the groups were interacting was associated with lower bias in nonverbal facial reactions in response to contributions by in-group and out-group members. Whereas interaction activated several processes that can lead to reduced bias, including decategorization, consistent with the common in-group identity model (SL Gaertner, JF Dovidio, PA Anastasio, BA Bachman, & MC Rust, 1993) as well as M. Hewstone and RJ Brown’s (1986) group differentiation model, the primary set of mediators involved participants’ representations of the memberships as 2 subgroups within a superordinate entity.