Crossing conflicting state boundaries: The Georgian-Abkhazian Ceasefire Line
Crossing conflicting state boundaries: The Georgian-Abkhazian Ceasefire Line
复制标题
跨越冲突国家边界：格鲁吉亚-阿布哈兹停火线
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Weiss
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Weiss
从全球角度来看，国家边界经常有争议，仍然有争议，或者至少几十年来没有通过双边或多边条约划定和确定。然而，在这方面特别严格的是停火线，迄今为止，对停火线的研究如果不是没有研究的话，也是不足的，特别是作为一种特殊类型的边界。由于停火线是国家间或分离主义冲突的结果，在大多数情况下，其他国际或第三国要么参与解决这些冲突，要么甚至是停火线管理的一个组成部分，有时以非军事区的形式。正如Dan Rabinowitz和Sliman Khawalde（2000年）所概述的那样，怀疑是非军事化地区日常生活的一部分，格鲁吉亚-格鲁吉亚CFL的情况肯定就是如此。国家及其代理人特别注意这些地区的行动和居民，并持怀疑态度，往往将本国公民视为外国人。这些地区的过境者或居民在日常生活中不断引起不忠甚至叛国的怀疑。
In a global perspective state borders are very often contested, remain contested or at least are not demarcated and unfixed by bi- or multinational treaties for decades. However, of particular rigour in this respect are ceasefire lines, which so far have been under-researched, if not unresearched, especially as a particular type of border. As ceasefire lines are the result of interstate or secessionist conflicts, for the most part other international or third states have been involved either in the settlement of these conflicts or are even an integral part of the ceasefire line (CFL) management, sometimes in the form of a de-militarized zone. As Dan Rabinowitz and Sliman Khawalde (2000) have outlined, suspicion is part of the everyday life regime in a de-militarized zone, which is certainly the case for the Georgian-Abkhazian CFL. States and their agents pay particular attention to movement and residents in these zones with a priori sceptical attitude, and very often see their own citizens as aliens. Border-crossers or residents of these zones arouse constant suspicion of disloyalty or even treason in their everyday life.