Validation of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Validation of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00776-003-0679-x
复制
发表时间：
2003-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Nakamura, Takashi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Suzukamo, Yoshimi;Fukuhara, Shunichi;Nakamura, Takashi
这项研究旨在验证翻译的，文化适应的问卷。我们研究了可靠性，有效性和反应的Roland-Morris问卷（RDQ）的日本版本时，评估残疾的日本患者腰痛。RDQ是一个可靠的，经过验证的量表，用于测量由腰痛引起的残疾。但是，没有经过验证的日语版问卷。一系列的214名门诊腰痛患者参加了这项验证研究。患者接受了RDQ和SF-36，并评估了他们的疼痛和整体健康评级。其中57例临床症状稳定者2周后再次给予RDQ。信度检验采用重测法和内部一致性检验。用Chronbach证明了足够的可靠性。相关系数为0.85，30例患者的重复性为r = 0.91。主成分分析显示出单维性。133例患者治疗后RDQ评分均明显改善。RDQ的日本版本是一个有用的规模，易于使用的可靠性，有效性和反应性时，评估患者腰痛。
The study was designed to validate a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire. We examined the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RDQ) when assessing disability in Japanese patients with low back pain. The RDQ is a reliable, validated scale used to measure disability caused by low back pain. However, no validated Japanese version of this questionnaire is available. A series of 214 outpatients with low back pain participated in this validation study. The patients were given the RDQ and the SF-36, and assessed their pain and global rating of health. Among them, 57 who were clinically stable were given the RDQ again 2 weeks later. The reliability was examined based on the test-retest method and internal consistency. Sufficient reliability was demonstrated with a Chronbach's. coefficient of 0.85, and the reproducibility for the 30 patients was r = 0.91. The principal component analysis showed unidimensionality. The RDQ score of the 133 patients was significantly improved after treatment. The Japanese version of the RDQ is a useful scale that is easy to use with reliability, validity, and responsiveness when assessing patients with low back pain.