Collective interviewing of suspects.
Collective interviewing of suspects.
复制标题
集体约谈犯罪嫌疑人。
DOI：
10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.12.002
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Vrij A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Vrij A
当人们在集体中就可能犯下的不当行为接受采访时，他们通常是单独接受采访的。然而，在一些情况下，一起采访嫌疑人会更直观、更方便。重要的是，这样的集体访谈可以提供欺骗的口头线索。这是第一个调查集体访谈的欺骗实验。21对说真话的人和22对说谎话的人就一起在餐馆吃午饭的事接受了成对的采访。考虑到说真话的人在采访中采取“实话实说”的策略，而与之相反，说谎者更喜欢保持故事的简单，我们预测说真话的人会(i)打断对方，（ii）更多地纠正对方，（iii）比说谎者更多地为对方的答案添加信息。研究结果支持了这些假设。理论驱动的干预措施，以引出更多的线索，欺骗通过同时采访进行了讨论。
When people are interviewed about possible wrongdoing that has been committed in groups, they typically are interviewed separately. Yet, in several settings it would be more intuitive and convenient to interview suspects together. Importantly, such collective interviews could yield verbal cues to deception. This is the first deception experiment to investigate collective interviewing. Twenty-one pairs of truth tellers and 22 pairs of liars were interviewed pair-wise about having had lunch together in a restaurant. Given that truth tellers adopt a “tell it all” strategy in the interviews while, in contrast, liars prefer to keep their stories simple, we predicted that pairs of truth tellers would (i) interrupt and (ii) correct each other more, and would (iii) add more information to each other's answers than pairs of liars. The results supported these hypotheses. Theory-driven interventions to elicit more cues to deception through simultaneous interviewing are discussed.