Comparing three sampling techniques for estimating fine woody down dead biomass
Comparing three sampling techniques for estimating fine woody down dead biomass
复制标题
比较三种估算细木本死亡生物量的采样技术
DOI:
10.1071/wf13038
复制
发表时间:
2013
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
Kathy Gray
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Keane;Kathy Gray
Designing woody fuel sampling methods that quickly, accurately and efficiently assess biomass at relevant spatial scales requires extensive knowledge of each sampling method's strengths, weaknesses and tradeoffs. In this study, we compared various modifications of three common sampling methods (planar intercept, fixed-area microplot and photoload)forestimatingfinewoodysurfacefuelcomponents(1-,10-,100-hfuels)usingartificialfuelbedsofknownfuel loadings as reference. Two modifications of the sampling methods were used: (1) measuring diameters only and both diameters and lengths and (2) measuring diameters to (a) the nearest 1.0mm, (b) traditional size classes (1h ¼0-6mm, 10h ¼6-25mm, 100h ¼25-76mm), (c) 1-cm diameter classes and (d) 2-cm classes. We statistically compared differences in sampled biomass values to the reference loading and found that (1) fixed-area microplot techniques were slightly more accurate than the others, (2) the most accurate loading estimates were when fuel particle diameters were measured and not estimated to a diameter class, (3) measuring particle lengths did not improve estimation accuracy, (4)photoloadmethodsperformedpoorlyunderhighfuelloadsand(5)accurateestimateoffuelbiomassrequiresintensive sampling for both planar intercept and fixed-area microplot methods. Additional keywords: fixed-area plot, fuel inventory, fuel loading, line intersect, monitoring, photoload, planar intercept.