Ethical challenges for the "outside" researcher in community-based participatory research
Ethical challenges for the "outside" researcher in community-based participatory research
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1090198104269566
复制
发表时间：
2004-12-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Minkler, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Minkler, M
尽管基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)分享了健康教育和相关领域的许多核心价值观，但经常采用这种调查方法的外部研究人员面临着棘手的伦理挑战。在简要回顾了CBPR的概念和历史根源之后，介绍了凯利的基于社区的研究的生态学原则和琼斯的理解种族主义的三层框架，作为帮助探索几个关键挑战的有用框架。这些问题是：(A)实现真正的“社区驱动”议程；(B)局外人之间的紧张关系；(C)真实的和被认为的种族主义；(D)“参与”的局限性；(E)涉及分享、所有权和利用调查结果以供采取行动的问题。案例研究被用于对这些主题的初步探索。格林等人的S评估CBPR项目的指导方针随后被强调为一个重要工具，可以帮助CBPR合作伙伴更好地解决这种方法往往固有的具有挑战性的伦理问题。
Although community-based participatory research (CBPR) shares many of the core values of health education and related fields, the outside researcher embracing this approach to inquiry frequently is confronted with thorny ethical challenges. Following a brief review of the conceptual and historical roots of CBPR, Kelly's ecological principles for community-based research and Jones's three-tiered framework for understanding racism are introduced as useful frameworks for helping explore several key challenges. These are (a) achieving a true "community-driven" agenda; (b) insider-outsider tensions; (c) real and perceived racism; (d) the limitations of "participation"; and (e) issues involving the sharing, ownership, and use of findings for action. Case studies are used in an initial exploration of these topics. Green et al.'s guidelines for appraising CBPR projects then are highlighted as an important tool for helping CBPR partners better address the challenging ethical issues often inherent in this approach.