Positive and negative remember judgments and ROCs in the plurals paradigm: evidence for alternative decision strategies.
Positive and negative remember judgments and ROCs in the plurals paradigm: evidence for alternative decision strategies.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/mc.38.5.541
复制
发表时间：
2010-07
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Rotello CM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kapucu A;Macmillan NA;Rotello CM
使用旧的新的评级和记住知道的判断，我们探讨了多元化的范式，其中研究的话必须区分从多元化改变诱惑。该范式允许我们研究消极记忆，即记住一个复数改变的研究项目;发现这种判断能力比传统的积极记忆差或等同。一个反应偏差操纵影响积极的，但不是消极的记忆。评级被用来构建ROC曲线和测试的预测最常见的双过程理论的再认记忆，回忆的量可以独立估计ROC曲线和从记住的判断。通过用纯信号检测（SDT）模型和结合SDT和阈值成分（HTSDT）的双加工模型拟合个体数据，我们确定了两种类型的受试者。对于那些更好地描述了HTSDT，记忆知道和ROC措施的预测收敛。对于SDT描述较好的被试，ROC截距不能预测记忆率。这些数据与所有受试者依赖于相同的表示，但基于决策空间的不同分区的想法是一致的。
Using old-new ratings and remember-know judgments we explored the plurals paradigm, in which studied words must be distinguished from plurality-changed lures. The paradigm allowed us to investigate negative remembering, that is, the remembering of a plural-altered study item; capacity for this judgment was found to be poorer than or equivalent to the conventional positive remembering. A response-bias manipulation affected positive but not negative remembering. The ratings were used to construct ROC curves and test the prediction of the most common dual-process theory of recognition memory that the amount of recollection can be independently estimated from ROC curves and from remember judgments. By fitting the individual data with pure signal-detection (SDT) models and dual-process models that combined SDT and threshold components (HTSDT), we identified two types of subjects. For those who were better described by HTSDT, the predicted convergence of remember-know and ROC measures was observed. For those who were better described by SDT the ROC intercept could not predict the remember rate. The data are consistent with the idea that all subjects rely on the same representation but base their decisions on different partitions of a decision space.