Tokyo, Bidding for the Olympics and the Discrepancies of Nationalism
Tokyo, Bidding for the Olympics and the Discrepancies of Nationalism
复制标题
东京、申奥与民族主义的差异
DOI：
10.1080/09523367.2013.878501
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Satoshi Shimizu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
大沼義彦;大沼義彦;Yutaka Miura;三浦 裕;三浦 裕;三浦 裕;Yutaka Miura;近藤亜希子，千葉遥，廣瀬圭，西川太朗，土岐仁;廣瀬圭，土岐仁，近藤亜希子;丹羽佳祐，近藤亜希子，齋藤亜由子，土岐仁，伏見知何子;廣瀬圭，土岐仁，近藤亜希子;小林好信，山口香，松田基子，岡田弘隆，橋本佐由理;小林好信，橋本佐由理;山口香,松田基子,小林好信,橋本佐由理,岡田弘隆;松田基子,山口香,小林好信,橋本佐由理,岡田弘隆;小林好信,山口香,松田基子,橋本佐由理,岡田弘隆;山口 香・松田 基子・小林 好信・橋本 佐由理;橋本 佐由理・小林 好信・松田 基子・山口 香;丸山剛生;Satoshi Shimizu
自1896年第一届现代奥运会以来，只有几个城市已经或将不止一次举办夏季奥运会和残奥会：伦敦、巴黎、洛杉矶、雅典和东京。毫无疑问，东京为筹备1964年东京奥运会而进行的基础设施改善和结构变化表明，日本正在经历显着的经济增长。东京97%的奥运预算专门用于改善基础设施，这导致了东京的政治和经济过度集中。纵观2016年和2020年奥运会的申办过程，可以看出，人们对体育的各种期望本质上是政治性的：从仅仅记住遗产作为代表的政治问题，到一个国家以参与奥运会为基础的现状。1961年颁布的《体育促进法》在50年后进行了修订，体育政策开始被视为国家战略。这项新法案成为建立体育机构的基础，并具体规定了政府对举办该机构所推动的国际体育赛事的支持。现在是时候认真考虑对民族主义进行批判性辩论的必要性了，以及如何从体育治理的角度确定国家与体育之间的关系。
Since the first Modern Olympics in 1896 only a few cities have hosted or will host the Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games more than once: London, Paris, Los Angeles, Athens and Tokyo. There is no doubt that the improvements in infrastructures and structural changes that were carried out for Tokyo in preparation for the 1964 Tokyo Olympics demonstrated that ‘Japan was experiencing remarkable economic growth’. The ‘development’ of Tokyo, 97% of the Olympic budget being earmarked for improvements to infrastructures, resulted in excessively centralised politics and economics. Looking at the bidding process to host the 2016 and 2020 Olympics, it can be seen that various expectations of sports are political in nature: from the political problem of remembering legacies as mere representations to the current situation of a nation basing its presence on involvement in the Olympics. The Sports Promotion Act enacted in 1961 was revised 50 years later, and policies on sport came to be regarded as national strategies. The new act became the basis for establishing the Sports Agency and specified governmental support for hosting the international sporting events it promotes. The time has come to seriously consider the necessity of critically arguing about nationalism, as well as how to determine the relationship between a nation and sport in terms of sport governance.