The Centre for Market and Public Organisation School Assignment, School Choice and Social Mobility School Assignment, School Choice and Social Mobility

The Centre for Market and Public Organisation School Assignment, School Choice and Social Mobility School Assignment, School Choice and Social Mobility
复制标题

市场和公共组织中心 学校分配、择校和社会流动性 学校分配、学校选择和社会流动性

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
--
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Briggs
A. Briggs
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Burgess;A. Briggs

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

市场与公共组织研究中心(CMPO)是一个领先的研究中心,结合了经济学、地理学和法学的专业知识。我们的目标是研究公共和私营经济部门之间的交集,特别是了解组织和提供公共服务的正确方式。该中心旨在开展研究,促进公众辩论,并为决策提供信息。CMPO现为ESRC研究中心,成立于1998年,获得了利华休姆信托基金的两笔大笔赠款。2004年,我们被授予ESRC研究中心地位,CMPO现在结合了ESRC和信托基金的核心资金。我们估计了贫困儿童和非贫困儿童进入好学校的机会,分析了贫困、地理位置和学校分配之间的关系。我们的数据集使我们能够非常精确地测量位置和距离。上一所好学校的可能性的简单的无条件差异是巨大的。我们进行了一项分析,完全控制了位置,利用了街道内的变化,并控制了其他个人特征。贫困家庭的孩子上好学校的可能性要小得多。我们表明,贫困儿童进入好学校的机会较低,基本上不受选择程度的影响。
The Centre for Market and Public Organisation (CMPO) is a leading research centre, combining expertise in economics, geography and law. Our objective is to study the intersection between the public and private sectors of the economy, and in particular to understand the right way to organise and deliver public services. The Centre aims to develop research, contribute to the public debate and inform policy-making. CMPO, now an ESRC Research Centre was established in 1998 with two large grants from The Leverhulme Trust. In 2004 we were awarded ESRC Research Centre status, and CMPO now combines core funding from both the ESRC and the Trust. Abstract We estimate the chances of poor and non-poor children getting places in good schools, analysing the relationship between poverty, location and school assignment. Our dataset allows us to measure location and distance very precisely. The simple unconditional difference in probabilities of attending a good school is substantial. We run an analysis that controls completely for location, exploiting within-street variation and controlling for other personal characteristics. Children from poor families are significantly less likely to go to good schools. We show that the lower chance of poor children attending a good school is essentially unaffected by the degree of choice.