Energy security and sustainability in Northeast Asia
Energy security and sustainability in Northeast Asia
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.001
复制
发表时间：
2011-11
期刊：
影响因子：
9
通讯作者：
D. V. von Hippel;Tatsujiro Suzuki;James H. Williams;T. Savage;P. Hayes
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. V. von Hippel;Tatsujiro Suzuki;James H. Williams;T. Savage;P. Hayes
对于那些参与制定能源政策的人来说，“能源安全”通常意味着确保获得石油和其他化石燃料。然而，随着能源市场日益全球化和多样化，以及能源转换和使用造成的跨国问题日益增多，旧的能源安全理由已不那么突出，而包括气候变化和其他环境、经济和国际考虑在内的其他问题正变得越来越重要。因此，需要一个更全面的“能源安全”的操作定义，沿着一个可行的框架来分析未来的能源路径或情景可能在更广泛，更全面的意义上产生更大的能源安全。作为鹦鹉螺研究所“太平洋亚洲区域能源安全”项目的一部分所做的工作为能源安全制定了一个更广泛的定义，并描述了一个分析框架，旨在帮助比较使用LEAP（长期能源替代规划）系统等软件工具制定的不同定量能源路径的能源安全特征-包括积极和消极的特征。
“Energy Security” has typically, to those involved in making energy policy, meant mostly securing access to oil and other fossil fuels. With increasingly global, diverse energy markets, however, and increasingly transnational problems resulting from energy transformation and use, old energy security rationales are less salient, and other issues, including climate change and other environmental, economic, and international considerations are becoming increasingly important. As a consequence, a more comprehensive operating definition of “Energy Security” is needed, along with a workable framework for analysis of which future energy paths or scenarios are likely to yield greater Energy Security in a broader, more comprehensive sense. Work done as a part of the Nautilus Institute's “Pacific Asia Regional Energy Security” (PARES) project developed a broader definition of Energy Security, and described an analytical framework designed to help to compare the energy security characteristics – both positive and negative – of different quantitative energy paths as developed using software tools such as the LEAP (Long-range Energy Alternatives Planning) system.