Five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance by community-dwelling adults: A preliminary investigation of times, determinants, and relationship with self-reported physical performance
Five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance by community-dwelling adults: A preliminary investigation of times, determinants, and relationship with self-reported physical performance
复制标题
DOI：
10.3233/ies-2007-0253
复制
发表时间：
2007-01-01
影响因子：
0.7
通讯作者：
Sigouin, Christopher S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bohannon, Richard W.;Shove, Megan E.;Sigouin, Christopher S.
重复 5 次坐站 (STS) 测试是一种广泛使用但评估不足的下肢力量测试。因此，我们描述了社区居住成年人样本的 STS 测试时间，检查了年龄、性别、身高、体重和体重指数 (BMI) 与 STS 时间的关联，并确定了 STS 时间与自我报告的身体机能的关系。九十四名社区居民成年人参加了。 STS 时间的重复测量是可靠的（组内相关系数 = 0.957）。所有 94 名受试者的平均 STS 时间为 7.6 秒。年龄、体重和BMI与STS时间显着相关（r = 0.281-0.528），但性别和身高则不然（r = -0.074 - 0.007）。回归分析显示，年龄和 BMI 解释了 STS 时间差异的 43.7%。 STS 时间和身体机能之间的相关性 (r = -0.474) 显着 (p < 0.001)。回归分析显示，年龄和体重指数略微增加了 STS 时间对身体功能差异的解释。 总之，本研究提供的 STS 时间可能有助于解释通过测试筛选的成年人的表现。此类表现应根据年龄和体重指数来考虑。 STS 时间与身体机能的关系提供了该测量有效性的证据。
The 5-repetition sit-to-stand (STS) test is a widely used, but insufficiently evaluated, test for lower limb strength. We therefore described STS test times for a sample of community-dwelling adults, examined the association of age, gender, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) with STS time, and determined the relationship of STS time with self-reported physical functioning. Ninety-four community dwelling adults participated. Repeated measures of STS time were reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.957). The mean STS time for all 94 subjects was 7.6 seconds. Age, weight, and BMI were (r = 0.281-0.528), but gender and height were not (r = -0.074 - 0.007), correlated significantly with STS time. Regression analysis showed that age and BMI explained 43.7 percent of the variance in STS time. The correlation between STS time and physical functioning (r = -0.474) was significant (p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that age and BMI added slightly to the explanation of variance in physical functioning provided by STS time.In conclusion, this study provides STS times that might be useful for interpreting performance of adults screened with the test. Such performance should be considered in light of age and BMI. The relationship of STS time with physical functioning provides evidence of the validity of the measure.