Is the “Ideal” γ-Probe for Intraoperative Radioguided Surgery Conceivable?
Is the “Ideal” γ-Probe for Intraoperative Radioguided Surgery Conceivable?
复制标题
用于术中放射引导手术的“理想”γ 探针是否可以想象?
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2005
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Rubello
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Mariani;A. Vaiano;O. Nibale;D. Rubello
Publication in this issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine of the article by Classe et al. (pages 395–399 (1)) gives the opportunity for some considerations both from a speculative and from a practical point of view about the use of intraoperative -probes for radioguided surgery. After a slow start with the introduction of radioimmunoguided surgery in the 1980s, the last 10 years or so have witnessed a continuous exponential growth in the worldwide use of intraoperative -probes. These probes are now used in a variety of radioguided surgical procedures, mostly (but not exclusively) dealing with treatment of malignant disease, such as in the search for sentinel lymph nodes (2– 13). This trend has driven manufacturers to develop and introduce to the market several different types of -probes, each claimed to be the ultimate, unique solution to the technical difficulties encountered both in wide clinical routine and in experimental clinical protocols. The features that the nuclear medicine physician and the surgeon should take into account when choosing an intraoperative -probe can be defined, considering that the goal of radioguided surgery is to search for (count), detect, and localize hot lesions through a surgical incision of the skin (10). Therefore, an intraoperative probe should first be small and easy to handle, thus allowing minimally invasive surgery whenever adequate. The ergonomic aspects of -probes are important also when specific applications are contemplated; for instance, designing the detecting component on a lateral window rather than on the tip of the probe could be advantageous for applications of radioguided surgery during laparoscopy or thoracoscopy. Sensitivity is important for detecting hot lesions. It can be defined as the fraction of the emitted radiation that the probe can detect; overall sensitivity is linked to a geometric component (fraction of emitted radiation that intersects the detector, which depends on the solid angle subtended by the probe) and to an intrinsic component (fraction of radiation absorbed within the detector, which depends on the detecting material). High sensitivity allows the detection of low-activity sources. Spatial resolution and shielding are the key parameters for localizing the source; good spatial resolution allows one to distinguish sources close to each other, as when the sentinel lymph node is close to the radiocolloid injection site. Intraoperative probes are intended for directional counting. In this regard, shielding is important to prevent radiation from unwanted locations from interacting with the detector and producing counts; this parameter is critical mostly when a high background signal is present. The energy resolution is an important determinant in counting performance, since good energy resolution allows one to recognize and discard scattered radiation based on energy discrimination. Scattered radiation contributes to the blurring of spatial information and spuriously increases background; therefore, it is important to discard counts coming from the scattered component of radiation. Linearity in energy and counting rate are also desirable to ensure that probes operate optimally in the range of radionuclides and activities used in clinical practice. The most important physical parameters defining the performance of an intraoperative -probe are summarized in Table 1. Obviously, a probe having the highest sensitivity, the best energy resolution (expressed as the percentage FWHM of the photopeak), the best scatter rejection, and the lowest spatial resolution for all radionuclides used clinically would be the probe of choice. Unfortunately, no single probe can have optimal values for each of these performance parameters; for instance, sensitivity and spatial resolution are inversely related to each other. The complexity of these parameters and possible conflict between some of them clearly indicate that it is not possible, either from a theoretic or from a practical point of view, to conceive a -probe characterized by the best performance in all parameters. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the best -probe is generally the best compromise. In this view, it should be emphasized that the best compromise depends strictly on the type of radioguided surgery that is planned. For example, when the predominant use of the -probe is for radioguided biopsy of the sentinel lymph node in patients with breast cancer or with melanoma (or with other solid tumors characterized by a high lymphogenic metastatic potential), the most important parameter is sensitivity. In fact, it is crucial to detect with the -probe, also, lymph nodes with a low counting rate (10,11). On the other hand, maximum spatial resolution, although desirable, is relatively less important than sensitivity for sentinel lymph node procedures, especially in surgical protocols including complete removal of all hot sentinel nodes. Similarly, probe collimation aimed at restricting the angular field of view of the probe may not be a crucial factor in sentinel lymph node biopsy, at least when the Received Nov. 3, 2004; revision accepted Dec. 8, 2004. For correspondence or reprints contact: Giuliano Mariani, MD, Regional Center of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pisa Medical School, Via Roma 67, I-56126 Pisa, Italy. E-mail: g.mariani@med.unipi.it
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Kwo,DP;Barber,HB;Barrett,HH;Hickernell,TS;Woolfenden,JM
通讯作者:
Woolfenden,JM