The possibilities and limits to dialogue
The possibilities and limits to dialogue
复制标题
对话的可能性和限制
DOI：
10.1177/2043820618780566
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
27.5
通讯作者：
J. Crampton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Rose;Rob Kitchin;L. Rickards;U. Rossi;Ayona Datta;J. Crampton
在这篇文章中，我们将探讨学院内外对话的性质、价值和挑战。在考虑了对话的可能性和局限性后，我们将分析分为三个部分，首先讨论对话作为一种体现行动的形式，然后审查对话作为制定批判平权政治的手段，最后探讨参与对话的挑战作为一种方式实践公共地理。在每一种情况下，我们都提出了一些问题，涉及在社会紧张局势和政治分歧日益加剧的时代，对话的潜力和局限性。最后，我们建议，虽然有时对话脱离是必要的，如果有意义的对话的可能性的条件没有得到满足，学术对话继续发挥重要作用，在一个两极分化的时代，促进相互参与的空间。
In this article, we explore the nature, value, and challenges of dialogue both within and outside the academy. After considering the possibilities and limits to dialogue, we divide our analysis into three sections, first discussing dialogue as a form of embodied action, next examining dialogue as a means of enacting a critically affirmative politics, and finally exploring the challenges of engaging in dialogue as a way of practicing public geographies. In each case, we raise a number of questions concerning the potential of, and limitations to, dialogue in an age of increasing social tensions and political divides. We conclude by suggesting that although there are times when dialogical disengagement is warranted if the conditions of possibility for meaningful dialogue are unfulfilled, scholarly dialogue continues to play an important role in fostering spaces of mutual engagement in a polarized age.