Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment: Similarity in Quantitative Methods
Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment: Similarity in Quantitative Methods
复制标题
比较风险评估和环境影响评估：定量方法的相似性
DOI：
10.1007/1-4020-2243-3_19
复制
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
N. Bobylev
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Bobylev
城市固体废物场、有毒液体废物场以及前军事和工业污染场地的管理是大多数城市地区的一个紧迫问题。在大多数情况下，这些地点在规划和实施重建时需要管理决定。通常有两种情况需要作出决策：在受污染场地上开发新项目或场地保护。空间限制、当地居民的健康、历史遗址的保护-这些城市区域因素对决策过程施加了重大限制。本文将讨论一种定量分析方法，可用于城市污染场地开发改造项目的比较风险评价（CRA）和环境影响评价（EIA）。该方法已在俄罗斯彼得堡的几个项目中实施，包括在受石油产品污染的市中心场地上进行新的地下开发的CRA。
Management of municipal solid waste sites, toxic liquid waste sites, and former military and industrial contaminated sites is a pressing problem for most urban areas. In most cases these sites require management decisions when planning and instituting redevelopment. Very often decision-making is necessary for one of two cases: development of a new project on a contaminated site, or site conservation. Space limitations, health of local populations, preservation of historic sites–these urban area factors impose significant restrictions on the decision-making process. This present paper will discuss a quantitative analytical method that can be implemented for both Comparative Risk Assessment (CRA) and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of development and reconstruction projects at urban contaminated sites. This method was implemented for several projects in St. Petersburg, Russia, including a CRA for a new underground development on a downtown city site contaminated by petroleum products.