Emotions and affect in recent human geography
Emotions and affect in recent human geography
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00368.x
复制
发表时间：
2010-01-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Pile, Steve
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pile, Steve
本文旨在探讨情感地理学中如何探索情感以及情感地理学中如何理解情感。通过追踪情感和情感地理学的概念影响，我试图理解他们的方法之间的异同。我确定了三个关键的共识领域：优先考虑流动性的关系本体；在他们的账户中享有接近和亲密的特权；以及对民族志方法的青睐。即便如此，关于情绪和情感之间的关系（或非关系），仍然存在着根本性的分歧。然而，这种分歧给这两种方法带来了尴尬的问题，即如何理解情感和情感以及它们的地理分布。同样重要的是，绘制情感和情感地理学中的协议和分歧有助于探索这项工作的政治含义。我利用精神分析地理学来提出解决情感地理学和情感地理学中某些障碍的方法。
This paper seeks to examine both how emotions have been explored in emotional geography and also how affect has been understood in affectual geography. By tracing out the conceptual influences underlying emotional and affectual geography, I seek to understand both the similarities and differences between their approaches. I identify three key areas of agreement: a relational ontology that privileges fluidity; a privileging of proximity and intimacy in their accounts; and a favouring of ethnographic methods. Even so, there is a fundamental disagreement, concerning the relationship - or non-relationship - between emotions and affect. Yet, this split raises awkward questions for both approaches, about how emotions and affect are to be understood and also about their geographies. As importantly, mapping the agreements and disagreements within emotional and affectual geography helps with an exploration of the political implications of this work. I draw upon psychoanalytic geography to suggest ways of addressing certain snags in both emotional and affectual geography.