Adapting to life's slings and arrows: Individual differences in resilience when recovering from an anticipated threat.
Adapting to life's slings and arrows: Individual differences in resilience when recovering from an anticipated threat.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.005
复制
发表时间：
2008-08-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Taylor SF
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Waugh CE;Fredrickson BL;Taylor SF
在高度负面的事件之后，如果人们保持心理稳定，经历较少的心理健康问题，他们被认为是有弹性的。目前的研究调查了特质弹性（，ER 89）如何影响从预期的威胁中恢复。参与者查看线索（“厌恶”，“威胁”，“安全”），表示即将到来的图片（100%厌恶，50/50厌恶/中性，或100%中性;分别）的可能性，并提供连续的情感评级在线索，图片，和图片偏移后（恢复期）。高特质弹性（HighR）的参与者在观看了可能令人厌恶的中性图片后表现出更完整的情感恢复（与LowR相比）。虽然以前与弹性相关的其他人格特征（即，乐观、外倾、神经质）在任务的各个部分预测情感反应，没有中介特质弹性对情感恢复的影响。
Following highly negative events, people are deemed resilient if they maintain psychological stability and experience fewer mental health problems. The current research investigated how trait resilience (, ER89) influences recovery from anticipated threats. Participants viewed cues (‘aversive’, ‘threat’, ‘safety’) that signified the likelihood of an upcoming picture (100% aversive, 50/50 aversive/neutral, or 100% neutral; respectively), and provided continuous affective ratings during the cue, picture, and after picture offset (recovery period). Participants high in trait resilience (HighR) exhibited more complete affective recovery (compared to LowR) after viewing a neutral picture that could have been aversive. Although other personality traits previously associated with resilience (i.e., optimism, extraversion, neuroticism) predicted affective responses during various portions of the task, none mediated the influence of trait resilience on affective recovery.